• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Offers
  • How tos
  • Listicles
  • Explainers
  • A-Z
  • Downloads
    • Adobe
    • DxO software
    • Capture One
    • Exposure X
    • ON1 software
    • Skylum
  • About

Life after Photoshop

  • Lightroom
  • Capture One
  • DxO PhotoLab
  • Nik Collection
  • Exposure X
  • ON1 Photo RAW
  • Aurora HDR

Why SHOULDN’T you edit JPEGs?

February 20, 2023 by Rod Lawton

See what I did there? The question isn’t ‘why you shouldn’t’ but why shouldn’t you?’

For many the answer will be obvious. A JPEG is an 8-bit image file with its dynamic range already clipped by the camera and with any ‘spare’ color information discarded. Compared to a raw file, there’s very little processing headroom and images can very often start to break up under heavy manipulation.

So if you want to do any serious editing later, then shooting RAW is a must, right?

Normally I’d say yes, but here’s an instance where I decided to work from the JPEG rather than a RAW file, and I’ll explain why.

Image credit: ROD LAWTON

I was out shooting with my Olympus E-P7 and 17mm f/1.8 lens. It’s a great little walkaround setup that doesn’t attract much attention and it’s quick to use. It also has a wide range of in-camera color and black and white looks, with a choice of black and white filter effects, contrast, grain and more. Very often this camera can get close to the look I want without any further processing.

The other advantage is that if you shoot using your chosen look ‘live’ on the camera, it’s much easier to see how to compose the scene, what exposure adjustments you need and whether the image just ‘works’.

I thought this one did. Exposure and composition are very dependent on the image’s tonality and the look you are trying to achieve. I love the symmetry of the two vans framing a third in the distance, the empty expanse of the beach, the light – everything, really. It also needs that particular camera rendering to get that particularl tonality and grain.

But because I’m a bit of an image quality nerd and a hoarder, I shot this in JPEG+RAW so that I could go back and edit it ‘properly’ later if I needed to.

So why didn’t I edit the RAW version?

Two reasons.

  1. First, I decided I would have to spend several minutes working up the RAW file to match the camera JPEG I like so much.
  2. Second, there was nothing wrong with the JPEG that it needed RAW data to fix.

All this shot needed was a little straightening, which doesn’t do a JPEG any more harm than it does a RAW file, and I just felt the shadows needed a little deepening, which didn’t need any extra dynamic range, just a little adjustment to the tonal range I had already.

I did this in Capture One, but really Lightroom or any other image editor would have done just as well. It’s only with RAW files that you need to worry about different software renderings, profiles, noise reduction and the rest.

The top left corner of the sky is blown in the JPEG, but a little clipping often doesn’t matter in black and white and, indeed, can add a little ‘sparkle’. The JPEG has a nice, soft ‘roll-off’ in the highlights, too. When you work. to recover every scrap of highlight detail in a sky, it’s very easy to make them look muddy.

I’m very happy with my edited image. I could have spent ten times longer on the RAW file to get to the same state and been no better off at the end of it.

I’ll keep the RAW file for insurance, but the JPEG was absolutely fine.

Adobe Photography Plans

• Adobe Photography Plan: $9.99/month
• Adobe Photography Plan (1TB): $19.99/month
Lightroom Plan (1TB): $9.99/month

A trial version lasting just a few days is available

Choose a Photography Plan

Related

Filed Under: Featured, Ideas, OpinionTagged With: Black and white, Dynamic range, Grain, JPEG vs RAW, Picture control/style

Life after Photoshop is owned and run by photographer and journalist Rod Lawton. Rod has been a photography journalist for nearly 40 years, starting out in film (obviously) but then migrating to digital. He has worked as a freelance journalist, technique editor and channel editor, and is now Group Reviews Editor on Digital Camera World. Life after Photoshop is a personal project started in 2013.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to this site

Enter your email address to subscribe to Life after Photoshop and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Adobe Lightroom: what is it, where do you get it, what does it cost?

Adobe Lightroom is not one program but three. You could … [Read More...] about Adobe Lightroom: what is it, where do you get it, what does it cost?

The best photo editing software for organizing, editing, RAW and effects

Choosing the best image editing software used to be easy. … [Read More...] about The best photo editing software for organizing, editing, RAW and effects

Layers explained

Layers explained: what they do and how to use them

Layers are a central part of many photo editing processes, … [Read More...] about Layers explained: what they do and how to use them

BAN adjustments… Basic And Necessary image corrections to do first

Photo editing software does two quite different jobs. It can … [Read More...] about BAN adjustments… Basic And Necessary image corrections to do first

More Posts from this Category

Mission statement

Life after Photoshop is not anti-Photoshop or anti-subscriptions. It exists to showcase the many Photoshop alternatives that do more, go further, or offer more creative inspiration to photographers.

Affiliate links

Life after Photoshop is funded by affiliate links and may be paid a commission for downloads. This does not affect the price you pay, the ratings in reviews or the software selected for review.

Contact

Email lifeafterphotoshop@gmail.com

Copyright © 2023 Life after Photoshop · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in