• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Offers
  • How tos
  • Listicles
  • Explainers
  • A-Z
  • Downloads
    • Adobe
    • DxO software
    • Capture One
    • Exposure X
    • ON1 software
    • Skylum
  • About

Life after Photoshop

  • Lightroom
  • Capture One
  • DxO PhotoLab
  • Nik Collection
  • Exposure X
  • ON1 Photo RAW
  • Aurora HDR

Which film simulation plug-in is best?

December 7, 2013 by Rod Lawton

I love film. It’s what I grew up with, and it’s what I made most of my photographic discoveries – and mistakes – with. I love its richness, depth, unpredictability and character.

So I’m especially interested in any film simulation software which promises to replicate the look and feel of traditional silver-based films. But I’m also a bit sceptical, because many of the film simulations I see from plug-ins look quite suspect to me.

One problem is that they don’t always look like the films I used to use; another is that they don’t even agree with each other.

Film simulation plug-ins

So I’ve taken the same shot (above) and processed it using Alien Skin Exposure 5, Color Efex Pro, DxO FilmPack 4.5 and Silver Efex Pro, all of which promise to replicate the look of traditional film. I don’t have test results for all of them with every film because they don’t all support the same range of emulsions – but the results are interesting nonetheless.

On their own, each of these plug-ins makes a good case, but it’s when you put them up against each other that you realise they can’t all be right…

I’ve picked six ‘films’ to simulate. There are plenty more, but I’ve chosen the ones I know best from my own film photography days. I’ll start with the colour films, then move on to the black and white…

01 Kodachrome 25

Film simulation plug-ins

This was one of my favourite films. Slow as heck, true, but I thought it had really nice colour rendition, good saturation and not too much contrast.

Only two of these plug-ins offers a Kodachrome 25 simulation – Alien Skin Exposure 5 and DxO FilmPack 4.5

The Alien Skin rendition looks the best to me, while the DxO version doesn’t have the saturation I would expect. I’m not particularly convinced by either, to be honest. I’ve scanned plenty of Kodachrome 25 transparencies, so I know what to expect, and if I’d shot this scene on K25, I’d expect a much richer, more saturated outcome than either of these.

02 Kodachrome 64

Film simulation plug-ins

This was my favourite colour film, and I can’t really understand the (bad) reputation this film seems to have. Some say its colours are super-saturated and unreal (I think this is an unjustified Kodachrome reputation in general), others say K64 images have a magenta cast.

I don’t think either is true. My Kodachrome 64 transparencies have neutral, subtle tones and a particular ‘steely-grey’ rendition in skies that I really like.

But this is where you get the biggest variations in the digital versions. Of all of these, I think the Alien Skin Exposure 5 version is best, though to me it just looks like the original digital version with a tad more saturation.

Of the rest, the Color Efex Pro version is just a pantomime effect –too much contrast, too much saturation. The generic DxO FilmPack 4.5 version is OK but, again, looks just like the original with some tiny tweaks, but the non-generic DxO version (why are there two?) is flat, magenta and, to my eyes, just plain wrong.

03 Kodachrome 200

Film simulation plug-ins

I’ll admit I used Kodachrome 20o only twice, and found it grainy, contrasty and with such a strong magenta cast I vowed never to use it again…

The Alien Skin Exposure 5 rendition is very flattering, to say the least, the Color Efex Pro rendition is (again) a pantomime version that’s just plain wrong, while the DxO FilmPack 4.5 version is probably closest to the results I got from the real thing. Though much as I love K25 and K64, I don’t really want any of my shots to look as if they were taken on Kodachrome 200…

Related

Pages: Page 1 Page 2

Filed Under: UncategorizedTagged With: Film simulation

Life after Photoshop is owned and run by photographer and journalist Rod Lawton. Rod has been a photography journalist for nearly 40 years, starting out in film (obviously) but then migrating to digital. He has worked as a freelance journalist, technique editor and channel editor, and is now Group Reviews Editor on Digital Camera World. Life after Photoshop is a personal project started in 2013.

Primary Sidebar

Subscribe to this site

Enter your email address to subscribe to Life after Photoshop and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Adobe Lightroom: what is it, where do you get it, what does it cost?

Adobe Lightroom is not one program but three. You could … [Read More...] about Adobe Lightroom: what is it, where do you get it, what does it cost?

The best photo editing software for organizing, editing, RAW and effects

Choosing the best image editing software used to be easy. … [Read More...] about The best photo editing software for organizing, editing, RAW and effects

Layers explained

Layers explained: what they do and how to use them

Layers are a central part of many photo editing processes, … [Read More...] about Layers explained: what they do and how to use them

BAN adjustments… Basic And Necessary image corrections to do first

Photo editing software does two quite different jobs. It can … [Read More...] about BAN adjustments… Basic And Necessary image corrections to do first

More Posts from this Category

Mission statement

Life after Photoshop is not anti-Photoshop or anti-subscriptions. It exists to showcase the many Photoshop alternatives that do more, go further, or offer more creative inspiration to photographers.

Affiliate links

Life after Photoshop is funded by affiliate links and may be paid a commission for downloads. This does not affect the price you pay, the ratings in reviews or the software selected for review.

Contact

Email lifeafterphotoshop@gmail.com

Copyright © 2023 Life after Photoshop · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in